logologologo
  • (714) 547-5025
  • Workers’ Compensation
    • About Workers’ Compensation
    • What Is Workers’ Compensation?
    • What Does A Workers’ Compensation Attorney Do?
    • Types of Work Injuries
    • How Long Does a Workers’ Comp Case Take to Resolve in California?
    • When You Should Hire a Workers’ Compensation Attorney
    • Types Of Workers’ Compensation Benefits
    • How Workers’ Compensation Attorneys Get Paid
    • Do You Have a Workers’ Compensation Case?
    • Filing a Workers’ Comp Claim in California
    • Helping Injured California Workers
    • Have You Had a Career Ending Injury?
  • About
    • About Thomas F. Martin, PLC
    • Award Winning Workers’ Comp Lawyer
    • Fighting For Injured Workers’ Rights
    • Free Consultation
    • FAQ’s
    • News
  • Contact
logologologo
  • (714) 547-5025
  • Workers’ Compensation
    • About Workers’ Compensation
    • What Is Workers’ Compensation?
    • What Does A Workers’ Compensation Attorney Do?
    • Types of Work Injuries
    • How Long Does a Workers’ Comp Case Take to Resolve in California?
    • When You Should Hire a Workers’ Compensation Attorney
    • Types Of Workers’ Compensation Benefits
    • How Workers’ Compensation Attorneys Get Paid
    • Do You Have a Workers’ Compensation Case?
    • Filing a Workers’ Comp Claim in California
    • Helping Injured California Workers
    • Have You Had a Career Ending Injury?
  • About
    • About Thomas F. Martin, PLC
    • Award Winning Workers’ Comp Lawyer
    • Fighting For Injured Workers’ Rights
    • Free Consultation
    • FAQ’s
    • News
  • Contact
logologologo
  • (714) 547-5025
  • Workers’ Compensation
    • About Workers’ Compensation
    • What Is Workers’ Compensation?
    • What Does A Workers’ Compensation Attorney Do?
    • Types of Work Injuries
    • How Long Does a Workers’ Comp Case Take to Resolve in California?
    • When You Should Hire a Workers’ Compensation Attorney
    • Types Of Workers’ Compensation Benefits
    • How Workers’ Compensation Attorneys Get Paid
    • Do You Have a Workers’ Compensation Case?
    • Filing a Workers’ Comp Claim in California
    • Helping Injured California Workers
    • Have You Had a Career Ending Injury?
  • About
    • About Thomas F. Martin, PLC
    • Award Winning Workers’ Comp Lawyer
    • Fighting For Injured Workers’ Rights
    • Free Consultation
    • FAQ’s
    • News
  • Contact
  • (714) 547-5025
  • Workers’ Compensation
    • About Workers’ Compensation
    • What Is Workers’ Compensation?
    • What Does A Workers’ Compensation Attorney Do?
    • Types of Work Injuries
    • How Long Does a Workers’ Comp Case Take to Resolve in California?
    • When You Should Hire a Workers’ Compensation Attorney
    • Types Of Workers’ Compensation Benefits
    • How Workers’ Compensation Attorneys Get Paid
    • Do You Have a Workers’ Compensation Case?
    • Filing a Workers’ Comp Claim in California
    • Helping Injured California Workers
    • Have You Had a Career Ending Injury?
  • About
    • About Thomas F. Martin, PLC
    • Award Winning Workers’ Comp Lawyer
    • Fighting For Injured Workers’ Rights
    • Free Consultation
    • FAQ’s
    • News
  • Contact
by Thomas F. Martin
COVID-19, Remote Witness TestimonyMay 3, 20200 comments

Remote Witness Testimony Is Here!

Surprise! Remote testimony at the WCAB isn’t breaking news. It’s been around for decades.

For example, an injured worker who lived outside of California was unable to fly or drive to the Santa Ana WCAB due to industrial COPD. Concerned that the applicant was unable to obtain the benefits, I filed a petition before Judge Richard Lee (retired) for an order that the defendant arrange and pay for a video link between two “video centers” – one near the applicant’s home, and here in Orange County. Judge Lee granted the Petition, and not surprisingly, the issues in the case got resolved right after the order. That was in 1994.

Today, technology makes remote testimony as easy as reaching for a cell phone, and the WCAB has embraced new ways to swear in and observe witness testimony remotely.

In Vargas vs. Becker 2017 Cal. Wrk. Comp. PD LEXIS 276, the applicant lived in Mexico and was unable to attend the trial. The applicant instead testified at the trial through a Spanish interpreter by iPhone, using the FaceTime application.

The defendant in Vargas unsuccessfully challenged the cell phone testimony on several grounds.

First, the defendant contended that because the oath was administered remotely, it was defective. However, the WCAB found that there was no violation of Evidence Code 710 because the applicant “took the oath in the form provided by law.”

Second, the Board determined that since the defendant “had an opportunity to probe the truth of the applicant’s testimony by subjecting him to cross-examination” due process standards were met (citing Ogden Entertainment Services vs. WCAB (Von Ritzhoff) 233 Cal. App. 4th 970; 80 CCC 1). 

Third, and significantly, the Board held that the WCJ’s admission of the applicant’s testimony by cell phone was proper under Labor Code sections 5708 and 5709.

Regarding section 5708, the Board stated that “hearings before the WCJ shall not be bound by the common law or statutory rules of evidence and procedure, but may inquiry into the matter, through oral testimony and records, which is best calculated to ascertain the substantial rights of the parties.”

Similarly, the Board held that section 5709 provides that “no informality in any proceeding or in any manner of taking testimony shall invalidate any order, decision, award, or rule.” The Board went on to state the section permitted admission into the record, and use as proof of any fact in dispute, of any evidence not admissible under the common law or statutory rules of evidence and procedure”.

Experience tells us that when parties can’t resolve issues, the prospect of a prompt trial and decision – with witness testimony – encourages both sides to “get serious.”

Continuances to complete a trial – perhaps over months – will not only delay benefit resolution, but also create a docket backlog, drive up frictional costs, and interfere with the prompt administration of benefits.

Due to the COVID 19 pandemic, it is unclear when witnesses will be able to testify in the courtroom. Utilizing remote testimony technology is – and long has been – the solution to keeping the system moving.

Tags:
covid19 remote testimony remote witness testimony WCAB workerscompensation workerscompensationtrials
Assembly Bill 664 Will Reduce Frictional CostsPrev
COVID-19: 5 Solutions For Remote Testimony Before The WCABNext

Latest Posts

by Thomas F. Martin

Offsite Injuries: Are They Covered by Workers’ Compensation?

Workers’ compensation covers a variety of injuries sustained by workers on the job, from slips and falls to forklift accidents. But what if the worker is...

Offsite Injuries: Are They Covered by Workers’ Compensation?

Workers' CompensationFebruary 23, 2023
by Thomas F. Martin

Top Safety Risks In The Warehouse Workplace

The warehouse is a busy workplace with many moving parts — forklifts, workers, truckers, ladders, heavy boxes, and other machinery. The risk of injury at a...

Top Safety Risks In The Warehouse Workplace

Workers' CompensationFebruary 9, 2023
by Thomas F. Martin

Common Reasons Workers’ Compensation Claims Are Denied

Workers who file a workers’ compensation claim expect their injury or illness to be fully covered by their employer’s insurer. Unfortunately, there are...

Common Reasons Workers’ Compensation Claims Are Denied

News, Workers' CompensationJanuary 26, 2023
logo

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Explore
  • FAQ’s
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Orange, CA
  • Santa Ana, CA
  • Anaheim, CA

Address

2107 North Broadway
Suite 206
Santa Ana, CA 92706

Phone

714-547-5025

Find Us

The information appearing on this website are provided for informational purposes only, and do not constitute legal advice or opinions. Transmission or receipt of any information through this website shall not create or establish an attorney-client relationship, and do not act or rely upon any information appearing on this website without seeking specific and competent legal advice from an attorney. Laws are constantly changing, and the information appearing on this website may be outdated and inapplicable to your circumstances and are not guaranteed.

 

Testimonials found on this website are actual past client reviews of Thomas F. Martin PLC. We appreciate our clients and their willingness to share their experiences. Please keep in mind that these results do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.

 

DO NOT SEND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION THROUGH THIS WEBSITE since an attorney-client relationship will only be established by a written retainer of Thomas F Martin PLC, and in no other way. Each case is unique, therefore testimonials and endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty or prediction regarding the outcome of your potential case. Required Notice: "Making a false or fraudulent worker's compensation claim is a felony subject to up to 5 years in prison or a fine of up to $50,000 or double the value of the fraud, whichever is greater, or by both imprisonment and fine".

en English
en Englishes Spanish