logologologo
  • (714) 547-5025
  • About
  • Explore
  • FAQ’s
  • News
  • Contact
logologologo
  • (714) 547-5025
  • About
  • Explore
  • FAQ’s
  • News
  • Contact
logologologo
  • (714) 547-5025
  • About
  • Explore
  • FAQ’s
  • News
  • Contact
  • (714) 547-5025
  • About
  • Explore
  • FAQ’s
  • News
  • Contact
by Thomas F. Martin
Injured Workers Puzzle Picture, NewsMarch 10, 20200 comments

The Injured Workers Puzzle Picture Part 5: Utilization Review

As we discussed in part 4 of this series, insurance companies want injured workers to select a treating doctor from a “Medical Provider Network” (MPN) – all handpicked by the insurance company.

Also, doctors must follow the Medical Treatment Utilization Schedule – which is a guideline of approved treatment in the workers’ compensation system. This master list of appropriate treatment assures that treatment requests are reasonable.

You would think that insurance companies would automatically approve the treatment requests of their MPN doctors if it was withing the Medical Treatment Utilization Schedule – but you would be wrong.

Despite having total control over the doctors that treat you, and assurance that all treatment requests are within specific guidelines, the insurance companies have yet another way to avoid authorizing the treatment – its called “Utilization Review.”

The UR company – which is selected by the employer/claims administrator – reviews only the medical records provided by the employer/claims administrator, and the review may not even be a physician within the same specialty as the MPN physician. In fact, the UR doctor doesn’t even examine the patient.

If UR denies the treatment request, the injured worker has the right to challenge the denial if it was not done within certain strict timelines or is invalid for some other reason.

With all the ways an insurance company can limit or deny legitimate medical treatment, there is no question that they can save money, at least in the short term. But such tactics are short-sighted. For example:

  • Medical studies show that the longer it takes to get necessary medical treatment, the higher the risk of other medical complications. 
  • Permanent injury and work restrictions could be increased. 
  • Employers have to wait longer for their employees to return to production. 

This is just a partial list of the consequences of treatment delays. 

Think about it – in addition to facing the medical and financial challenges after a work injury, the injured worker also must navigate the additional burden of getting the necessary treatment. Another version of “insult after injury.”

Fortunately, the law provides many ways to challenge unreasonable delays and denials and get injured workers back on the road to recovery.

Once the treatment is completed, the injured worker will be evaluated for a permanent disability award.

We’ll cover that in the next segment.

Tom Martin 

Tags:
Worker’s Compensation worker’s compensation benefits Workers comp lawyer
Ripoff: Taxpayers Subsidize The "Gig Economy"Prev
Unsung Heroes During A Difficult TimeNext

Latest Posts

by Thomas F. Martin

Employers Challenge To California’s COVID-19 Protections is (Very) Short-sighted

According to an article published by EHS Today, numerous employer groups are attacking the State of California over important COVID-19 emergency standards...

Employers Challenge To California’s COVID-19 Protections is (Very) Short-sighted

COVID-19, NewsJanuary 15, 2021
by Thomas F. Martin

Part 2: Can Employers Require Employee Vaccination?

Employers who are unsure about whether to require employees to receive the COVID-19 vaccine or not should take into consideration the role of state and...

Part 2: Can Employers Require Employee Vaccination?

COVID-19December 17, 2020
by Thomas F. Martin

Part 1: Can Employers Require Employee Vaccination?

As numerous COVID-19 vaccines await FDA-approval, employers across the country are wondering what this means for their business. Should they require their...

Part 1: Can Employers Require Employee Vaccination?

COVID-19December 14, 2020
logo

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Explore
  • FAQ’s
  • Blog
  • Contact

Address

2107 North Broadway
Suite 206
Santa Ana, CA 92706

Phone

714-547-5025

Find Us

The information appearing on this website are provided for informational purposes only, and do not constitute legal advice or opinions. Transmission or receipt of any information through this website shall not create or establish an attorney-client relationship, and do not act or rely upon any information appearing on this website without seeking specific and competent legal advice from an attorney. Laws are constantly changing, and the information appearing on this website may be outdated and inapplicable to your circumstances and are not guaranteed.

 

Testimonials found on this website are actual past client reviews of Thomas F. Martin PLC. We appreciate our clients and their willingness to share their experiences. Please keep in mind that these results do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.

 

DO NOT SEND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION THROUGH THIS WEBSITE since an attorney-client relationship will only be established by a written retainer of Thomas F Martin PLC, and in no other way. Each case is unique, therefore testimonials and endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty or prediction regarding the outcome of your potential case. Required Notice: "Making a false or fraudulent worker's compensation claim is a felony subject to up to 5 years in prison or a fine of up to $50,000 or double the value of the fraud, whichever is greater, or by both imprisonment and fine".

en English
en Englishes Spanish